docs: fix typo

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/content/en/posts/effort-to-be-understood.md b/content/en/posts/effort-to-be-understood.md
index 7c69141b..0470055a 100644
--- a/content/en/posts/effort-to-be-understood.md
+++ b/content/en/posts/effort-to-be-understood.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Why do I feel that? I think it's because I don't feel seen. It feels like he's o
 
 * I expressed my unfamiliarity with the topic he's proposing, yet he kept dropping names (like those words you can't even find on the [Buddhism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism) Wikipedia page, something you have to dig deep to find out), without explaining anything.
 * He was talking about how Buddhism and psychoanalysis are connected, saying one thing from Buddhism is actually another thing from psychoanalysis, neither of which is explained! It's like saying "Hey, this multi-dimensional proton is actually that photon-quantum-ish quantifier from the famous Plato theory!" — just shut up. ==Why do you even utter a word when you know people won't understand, or why do you have to be so egotistic thinking everyone in the world cares about the same thing you do?==
-* He's not backing down, so I decided to take a little bit of my time exchanging ideas. He says a university is studying the relationship between Buddhism and psychoanalysis. I say, "Well, it sounds like they're trying to hard to make a connection here, which is what many Chinese academics do, especially in humanities." — because it's exactly what it sounds like. He didn't explain anything, so it's impossible to connect the dots! I expect to hear some convincing ideas, but I did not get what I want. He said, in response, "Well, they **are** fundamentally connected. **I** think it's meaningful work." — Still, he did not care to explain his words.
+* He's not backing down, so I decided to take a little bit of my time exchanging ideas. He says a university is studying the relationship between Buddhism and psychoanalysis. I say, "Well, it sounds like they're trying too hard to make a connection here, which is what many Chinese academics do, especially in humanities." — because it's exactly what it sounds like. He didn't explain anything, so it's impossible to connect the dots! I expect to hear some convincing ideas, but I did not get what I want. He said, in response, "Well, they **are** connected. **I** think it's meaningful work." — Still, he did not care to explain his words.
 
 Upon hearing his passive-aggressive response, I stopped talking and went back to my room. I don't like the energy there. As far as I'm concerned, keeping this conversation will do no good. (which is not actually a conversation, because you see, a conversation involves two individuals respecting each other, not just one person dumping unclear claims.) I've tried to exchange some ideas before, but his mind is not to be changed. He never stood corrected. And I'm not even trying to change his mind here. I just wanted to understand his opinion (or the opinions he read from someone else). Apparently, that was too much to ask for.