docs: discard old drafts

3 files changed, 0 insertions, 87 deletions

diff --git a/content/_drafts/one-device-one-use.md b/content/_drafts/one-device-one-use.md
deleted file mode 100644
index c92bb6bf..00000000
--- a/content/_drafts/one-device-one-use.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
----
-title: One Device, One Use
-date: 2025-03-21 16:03:07
-draft: true
----
-
-I remember struggling with all kinds of syncing methods when I started out using Obsidian and Logseq, which are both great apps but require third-party data syncing if you do not have a subscription.
-
-Why do I need to sync data across from all my devices? Well, I obviously need them on my laptop, tablet computer and smartphone... Right...?
-
-<!--more-->
-
-Cruelly, the answer is no. It's nice to have all the information you need on all of your devices, but it's hardly the case where you'll actually be taking or reading notes on your smartphone and you'll probably never open Duolingo on your laptop. 
-
-I used to tell myself I'll sync my notes on my iPhone just for browsing. The truth is that never happened. Logseq on iOS, for me, is just an icon that shouts "Hey, I'm a smart guy who use fancy note-taking apps!".
-
-This leads to the topic of today's post: You don't need omnipotent device that does everything but multiple powerful tools that does one or two things just the way they should be done.
-
-## What is *One Item, One Use*?
-
-I read this concept in a book, whose name I don't really remember. It's quite popular in the context of productivity and household management. It simply means using one item just for one purpose.
-
-For instance, if your couch is just for sitting on when watching television, then you shouldn't be napping or eating on it. Otherwise, you'll get sleepy or craving for food even when you just wanted to sit down and enjoy a good show.
-
-The same goes for devices. If you use your smartphone for browsing social media, being in touch with your friends and, of course, answering calls, then you shouldn't be reading or taking notes on it as well. It's very likely to get distracted when trying to focus on something.
-
-## Why *One Device, One Use*?
-
-Using one thing for just one purpose can help with mental declutter, being in the present, better focus, clear goals, quicker decision-making... I know I just listed a litany of cliché concepts from self-help books, so just let me explain.
-
-I own three devices (MacBook, iPad, iPhone), four if you count my smart watch. I am given various tasks every day, by my professors, my boss and myself. Question: which device should I use respectively for taking notes on class, brainstorming a new project idea, updating a worksheet, and reading an article.
-
-This is a decision-making issue. With the right app installed, I can complete any of these tasks on any of my devices. ==Being given a lot of options is not always pleasant.== 
-
-If you can only complete a certain task on a certain device, you'll know exactly what to do and how to do it. For example, before heading out for a meeting, I might think twice on whether to take note with my keyboard or do that with a pen and paper. However, if I have some rules, which forbids me to take meeting notes with any other methods but an iPad, I can make that decision in an instant.
-
-I have email app and IM apps installed on all of my devices. Sometimes I get confused about what to do. I might get back from a lunch break and started answering messages on my laptop, when I should be dealing with an important email.
-
-This is a focus issue. If you don't see push notifications popping out on your laptop screen but only red dots on your email app, you won't be having this problem.
-
-If you have more than one device like I do, consider practicing this *One Device, One Use* principle with me.
-
-## Form follows function
-
-Though we are not product designers, but we do need functions provided by devices that comes with a certain form.
-
-If you are not a millionaire, the reason you buy a laptop is mostly likely that you needed it for school or work.
diff --git a/content/_drafts/主体性与课题分离的应用.md b/content/_drafts/主体性与课题分离的应用.md
deleted file mode 100644
index dd0076af..00000000
--- a/content/_drafts/主体性与课题分离的应用.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
----
-title: 主体性与课题分离的应用
-subtitle:
-tags:
-mentioned_books:
-date: 2025-10-27T11:17:00
-categories:
-banner:
-draft: true
-toc: true
----
-
-
diff --git a/content/_drafts/什么样的人会在进步中被淘汰.md b/content/_drafts/什么样的人会在进步中被淘汰.md
deleted file mode 100644
index c84ca7a4..00000000
--- a/content/_drafts/什么样的人会在进步中被淘汰.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
----
-title: 什么样的人会在进步中被淘汰？
-tags: 
-date: 2025-07-14
-draft: true
-toc: true
----
-
-因为要拜托我给学生上输出课，带班老师给我发了其他校区老师做的课件。他们很喜欢「和优秀的人交流」，这些课件应该就是交流的结果，只不过这位「优秀老师」的自信似乎远超能力，以至于我每天都在改课件里的各种高中生常犯的语法错误（比如句子里没有连词但有多个谓语、名词单复数混乱、缺少介词[^1]、缺少冠词……）、英文标点后不加空格、各种诡异的格式问题、诡异的用词[^2]、除了她自己没人能看懂的提示词等等。更令人气愤的是，课件里还有很多事实错误，比如，明明标题上写的是 elf，图片却是仙子（应该是 fairy），仅仅因为中文都是「精灵」就混为一谈误导学生。输出课有一部分是给学生拓展新的表达，那一部分的课件散落着她自以为是地直接用中文翻译过来的英文表达。
-
-用 ChatGPT 生成出来的文本，就算不做溯源和验证，也比她胡乱写出来的准确得多。尽管不少[会使用一点 AI 工具的人也容易自以为是](/posts/ai-正在让人变得前所未有地自以为是/)，但这种自身能力低下还自以为是的人，是一定会被前者代替的。<!--more-->
-
-文章开头的碎碎念都是表现，是「症状」。至于「病因」，还需要细细拆解开来。为什么自身能力低下的人会这样自以为是？从这个例子中看，这个人的身份是「老师」，难免会有[教师的傲慢](/posts/教师的傲慢/)，她的自傲是「身份」赋予的。当「身份」这个概念被抽象出来，回答标题的问题就变得简单了。**最外围的身份认同固执且强烈的人最容易在进步中被淘汰。**
-
-此处的「进步」指的是社会进步和科技进步，人们恐惧的「AI 取代人类」，实际上无数次重复上演过，这一项技术还不足以被当作一个特例，仅仅是涉及的领域比较广而已。科技进步带来的生产力进步，本身就会使得人的劳动力在对应领域中变得不那么重要。代替人的不是科技，而是创造科技和使用科技的人。取代打字员的不是计算机，而是会使用文本编辑软件和打印机的人。同理，取代人类的不是 AI，而是会训练和使用 AI 工具的人。[^3]
-
-这里的身份，具体来说就是「我是 XXX」的认同感。上文中提到的这位老师认为「我是一个老师，我的知识和理解力都要胜于学生」，这就导致了工作时不够谨慎，觉得自己随便做出来的课件也不会受到学生质疑。[^4]这位老师一定还认为「既然我是一个教英语的老师，我的英语也一定很好」，这就导致了她认为自己不借助词典等权威工具，也能通过直觉和语感写出值得被学生写在笔记本上的知识，她意识不到她写出来的东西实际上充满了错误，连我这个写英文文章都必须借助 ChatGPT 修改文法问题的人都会挑错挑得厌烦。我的高中英语老师也是这样的人，不过她至少知道英文里一个句子只能有一个谓语。
-
-
-
-[^1]: 她竟然堂而皇之地在 PPT 的最后写了这样一句「升华」的句子：... to be more who we are（应该是 more of who we are 才对）。估计是沉浸在鸡汤里无法自拔，忘记了自己的真正职责是教好英语。
-
-[^2]: 有一节的标题叫做「Best speaker choosing」，应该是「Choosing the Best Speaker」。不仅语序和冠词弄错，标题也没有正确地大写。此外，这一部分比起做出选择（choose），更像是比赛（compete）。
-
-[^3]: 用 AI 写作的人并不会取代作家，因为这些人「不会使用 AI 工具」。写作是人类思想和情感的真实表达，而 AI 没有表达的目的，纯粹用 AI 写作的人往往也没有。
-
-[^4]: 尽管我和另一个助教老师在看她的课件时，几乎每一页都能挑出不恰当的地方。我们两个作为老师的资历自然远不如她。